MCOR Residents Win: TG RERA Orders Developer to Return Common Areas

In the bustling suburbs of Ameenpur, Hyderabad, where modern apartment complexes rise against the backdrop of urban expansion, a significant victory for homebuyers' rights has unfolded. The story of MCOR apartment residents represents more than just a legal triumph—it embodies the evolving landscape of real estate accountability and the growing power of regulatory authorities in protecting consumer interests.

The Genesis of a Dispute

The narrative begins with the 'Darbar' project, a residential development by MCOR LLP Projects, where dreams of homeownership met the harsh reality of developer non-compliance. Despite receiving their occupancy certificate in June 2023, residents discovered that their developer had deviated significantly from the approved layout plans.

The Parking Space Controversy

According to the sanctioned layout plan, each flat was entitled to a parking space of 125 square feet. However, MCOR LLP Projects provided only 100 square feet per flat, effectively reducing the allotted space by 20%. This allowed the developer to carve out five additional parking slots that were sold to other residents.

The Landmark Ruling

On May 17, 2025, TG RERA delivered a comprehensive ruling. The order, issued by Chairman N Satyanarayana along with members K Srinivasa Rao and Laxminarayana Jannu, ordered MCOR LLP Projects to hand over physical possession of all common areas to the apartment association.

Key Directives

• Developer must strictly adhere to sanctioned plans as approved by competent authority
• Any deviation from sanctioned plans will attract penal consequences as per RERA Act 2016
• Five additional parking slots restored to apartment association
• Developer restrained from interfering with common area administration

Broader Implications

The MCOR case represents a significant victory in establishing accountability in India's real estate sector. The comprehensive nature of the TG RERA ruling demonstrates how regulatory authorities can effectively use their powers under the RERA Act 2016 to protect homebuyer interests and set important precedents for future cases.

Conclusion

The case stands as a testament to the power of collective action, regulatory vigilance, and the growing maturity of India's real estate governance framework in protecting homebuyer interests across the country.