and get access to exclusive content
Explore Aurum kuberx Click here to explore
For the longest time, the AI industry believed that developing powerful foundational models required massive computational resources—specifically, highly advanced chips that only a few companies, like Nvidia, could provide. These chips are essential for training AI models, a process that demands billions of dollars in infrastructure and resources.
With this constraint in place, it seemed nearly impossible for new players to enter the field unless they had deep pockets and access to cutting-edge technology. And then came DeepSeek, a Chinese AI model that shattered this belief.
Despite facing strict US sanctions on semiconductor exports, Chinese researchers managed to train a highly competitive AI model. The global AI community was stunned.
For years, the belief was that China lacked the required "compute"—the high-end chips needed to train AI models at scale. The US government had ensured that Nvidia and other semiconductor giants could not supply their latest hardware to Chinese companies. Yet, DeepSeek emerged as a formidable competitor, built with significantly lower investment than its Western counterparts.
DeepSeek’s creators claim that they trained the model for just $6 million—a fraction of the billions spent by companies like OpenAI and Google. While the actual cost, including research, salaries, and infrastructure, may be higher, it still raises a crucial question:
Have major AI firms been overpaying for model development all along?
DeepSeek’s success shakes up the entire AI landscape in multiple ways:
This uncertainty has already impacted the stock market, with tech stocks experiencing a downturn as investors reassess the AI industry’s cost structures.
Unlike many US-based AI firms that guard their models behind closed doors, DeepSeek has embraced open-source development. Anyone can access, modify, and deploy it, making it even harder for proprietary models to maintain an edge.
This means that OpenAI, Microsoft, and Google are no longer competing with just one company—they're now up against an entire global open-source community working to refine and enhance DeepSeek.
Where does their competitive advantage lie now?
Of course, some researchers are questioning the credibility of DeepSeek’s claims. Could China have secretly accessed high-end chips despite US sanctions? Are their cost estimates accurate?
The AI community is already dissecting DeepSeek’s research papers, running tests to verify whether it truly cost so little to train such a powerful model. If these findings hold up, it could force a major rethink of AI economics worldwide.
A common question emerging from this discussion is: Why hasn’t India developed a similar AI model?
The answer lies in market protectionism. China has a closed AI market, where foreign companies like OpenAI and Google cannot freely operate. This has incentivized Chinese researchers to develop homegrown AI models, knowing that they have a massive domestic market to serve.
India, on the other hand, does not have the same restrictions. Companies like OpenAI and Google are freely offering AI services, making it difficult for Indian startups to compete in both quality and pricing. Without strong protectionist policies, Indian AI researchers face fewer incentives to build large-scale foundational models.
DeepSeek’s rise marks a potential turning point in AI development. If it proves that powerful AI models can be trained with lower costs and limited compute, the industry will need to rethink its entire approach to model building, infrastructure investment, and competitive strategy.
One thing is clear: The AI landscape has changed forever, and the world is watching.
News, Infographics, Blogs & More! Delivered to your inbox.