
The Real Estate (Regulation and Development) Act was enacted to improve transparency, accountability, and consumer protection in India’s real estate sector. While the law primarily safeguards homebuyers, it also provides a dispute-resolution framework for allottees and investors facing issues such as project delays, changes in specifications, or failure to honour commitments.
However, a recurring concern arises when investors do not possess a registered sale agreement. In such cases, the ability to approach RERA authorities becomes less straightforward, leading to uncertainty around legal remedies.
Under RERA, developers are mandated to enter into a formal agreement for sale with allottees and register it as per applicable state laws. This agreement forms the primary legal document establishing the rights and obligations of both parties. It typically includes details on possession timelines, payment schedules, project specifications, and penalties for delays.
Registration of the agreement strengthens its evidentiary value and provides a clear contractual basis for seeking relief before regulatory authorities.
When a sale agreement is unregistered or absent, the investor may face challenges in establishing a legally recognised relationship with the developer. RERA authorities generally rely on documentary evidence to determine whether the complainant qualifies as an allottee under the Act.
Without a registered agreement, developers may dispute the existence or terms of the transaction, complicating the complaint process and increasing the burden of proof on the investor.
Legal interpretations suggest that the absence of a registered sale agreement does not automatically bar an investor from approaching RERA. In certain cases, authorities have considered complaints based on alternative documentation that demonstrates intent and consideration.
Such documents may include allotment letters, payment receipts, builder-issued demand notices, email correspondence, or brochures that outline project commitments. These materials can collectively help establish the existence of a transaction, though outcomes vary based on facts and jurisdiction.
RERA authorities function as quasi-judicial bodies and examine complaints on a case-by-case basis. Their decisions often depend on whether sufficient evidence exists to show that the complainant was promised a unit in a registered project and has fulfilled financial obligations.
In the absence of a registered agreement, authorities may adopt a more cautious approach, and proceedings may take longer due to preliminary objections raised by developers.
Even if a complaint is admitted, the lack of a registered agreement can limit the scope of relief available. Enforcing possession timelines, penalty clauses, or interest claims becomes more complex without clearly documented contractual terms.
In some situations, investors may also be advised to explore parallel remedies under consumer protection laws or civil courts, depending on the nature of the dispute.
While seeking relief under RERA without a registered sale agreement is not entirely ruled out, it involves higher legal complexity and uncertainty. Registration remains the strongest safeguard for investors, providing clarity and enforceability.
In an increasingly regulated real estate environment, proactive documentation and legal diligence are essential to ensure that investor rights remain protected and enforceable.
Enjoyed this update? Visit PropTech Pulse for more real estate news and market insights.News, Infographics, Blogs & More! Delivered to your inbox.

