
Projects worth ₹31,000 crore have been approved under the Urban Challenge Fund within 20-25 days of the scheme's guidelines being finalised, said D. Thara, Additional Secretary, Ministry of Housing and Urban Affairs. The pace of approvals marks an early signal of how quickly cities and project sponsors have moved to tap the new financing window since its rules were formally notified.
Speaking at a FICCI conference, Thara said 44 percent of financing for approved projects is coming from non-banking financial companies, while 22 percent is from public-private partnerships. Bonds account for 5-7 percent of the financing, with commercial banks contributing the remaining share. This spread across NBFCs, PPPs, bonds and banks shows project sponsors drawing on a mix of financing channels rather than relying on any single source to fund approved projects.
Under the scheme, viability gap funding can cover up to 50 percent of project cost, split equally between the central and state governments. The remaining amount is to be raised through lenders and private equity. This structure is designed to reduce the upfront financial burden on individual cities while still requiring them to demonstrate the ability to attract market-based financing for the balance of project costs.
Also Read: World's Top 10 Costliest Rental Markets: Where India Ranks
Sanjay Kulshrestha, Chairman and Managing Director of HUDCO, said cities generate 60-70 percent of India's GDP from about 3 percent of its land, describing the Urban Challenge Fund as marking a shift from subsidy-based programmes to a challenge-based model. That framing points to a broader philosophy behind the fund: rather than allocating money on a formula basis, projects are expected to compete for funding based on their bankability and long-term viability.
Jagan Shah, professor of practice at IIT Delhi's Transportation Research and Injury Prevention Centre, said the private sector should drive the imagination behind urban renewal, particularly given capacity constraints in tier-II and tier-III cities. His comment points to a recurring theme in India's urban planning discourse: that smaller cities often lack the in-house technical and planning capacity that larger metros have built up over decades, making private sector involvement more critical for translating funding into executed projects.
The rapid pace of approvals within weeks of the scheme's guidelines being finalised points to strong early demand from cities for the fund's market-linked financing model. With viability gap funding covering up to half of project costs and the remainder raised through lenders and private equity, the structure is designed to stretch limited public funds further while drawing in private capital for urban infrastructure. How consistently this pace of approvals holds up over the coming months will likely determine whether the fund's early momentum translates into sustained investment across India's cities.
Enjoyed this update? Visit PropTech Pulse for more real estate news, investment insights, and property market trends.